Go to AAPM&R home page Go to AAPM&R home page Go to AAPM&R home page
     
Click Here to Search
MEMBER CENTER CONDITIONS & TREATMENT FIND A PM&R PHYSICIAN FOUNDATION FOR PM&R
PM&R JOURNAL
What is a Physiatrist?
About AAPM&R
 
 
  Legislation & advocacy
Regulation
Practice resources
Practice guidelines
Clinical pathways
Performance Measures Resources
State societies
 
Annual Assembly
Medical Education
Physiatrists' Job Board
PASSOR
Residents
Medical Students
Media Room
Industry Opportunities
Contact Us

 

 
Home  |  Legislative, Business and Clinical Practice Issues  |  Regulation  | 
 

Stark II Analysis and Summary

General Exceptions Protecting Ownership, Compensation or Both, continued

 


C. Prepaid Health Plans

The final rule generally repeats the statutory exception for DHS furnished to enrollees of risk contract HMOs and certain other specified prepaid health care organizations that have entered into contracts with HCFA to offer such services pursuant to statutory mandates. HCFA clarifies that the exception not only protects referrals by physicians for DHS to a specified prepaid plan, but also protects referrals to downstream providers and suppliers furnishing these services under a contract with a prepaid plan. HCFA also has provided for a corresponding exception for so-called risk sharing arrangements, which is discussed in V below. Medicaid managed care arrangements will be addressed in Phase II of the rulemaking.

|back to top|


D. Services Paid Under a Composite Rate

HCFA has defined DHS in the final rule to exclude services paid by Medicare as part of a composite payment for a group of services, unless the DHS category is itself paid under a composite rate (e.g., inpatient or outpatient hospital services). Thus, while the Stark I exception for clinical laboratory services furnished in an ASC, ESRD facility, or hospice remains for services included in the ASC rate, the ESRD composite rate, or the hospice per diem rate, the Phase I rule does not need a comparable exception for other DHS services.

|back to top|


E. Academic Medical Centers

In the final rule, HCFA provides for a new exception for academic medical centers, to permit referrals from a physician to an academic medical center if certain conditions are met. First, the referring physician must: (a) be a bona fide employee of a component of the academic medical center on a full-time or substantial part-time basis; (b) be licensed to practice medicine in the state; (c) have a bona fide faculty appointment at the affiliated medical school; and (d) provide either substantial academic or clinical teaching services for which he or she receives compensation as part of his or her employment relationship with the center.

In addition, the total compensation paid for the previous 12-month period from all academic medical center components to the referring physician must be set in advance, must not exceed fair market value in the aggregate for the services provided, must not be determined in a manner that takes into account the volume or value of any referrals or other business generated between the parties, and must not violate the anti-kickback statute.

Further, the academic medical center must ensure that: (a) all transfers of money between components of the center support the missions of teaching, indigent care, research, or community service; (b) the relationship of the center's components are set forth in a written agreement; and (c) all money paid to a referring physician for research is used solely for research.

|back to top|


F. Implants in an ASC

The final rule provides for a new exception for prosthetic and DME implants that are: (a) furnished by the referring physician or member of the referring physician's group practice in a Medicare-certified ASC with which the referring physician has a financial relationship; (b) implanted in the patient during a surgical procedure performed in the same ASC as where the implant was furnished; (c) furnished pursuant to an arrangement that does not violate the anti-kickback statute; and (d) billed and claimed in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations.

HCFA devised this exception to permit physicians to furnish implants in connection with surgeries performed in an ASC in which they have an ownership interest, recognizing that the new definition of DHS would not render this arrangement permissible because implants are not included in the bundled ASC facility rate.

|back to top|


G. EPO and Other Drugs Furnished in or by an ESRD Facility

The final rule provides for an exception for EPO and other specifically listed dialysis-related outpatient prescription drugs that are furnished in or by an ESRD facility, under an arrangement that does not violate the anti-kickback statute, and in accordance with Federal and state billing and claims submission laws and regulations. For purposes of the rule, the term "furnished" is defined to mean that the drugs are either administered or dispensed to a patient in or by the ESRD facility, even if furnished at home. "Dialysis-related drugs" are defined as drugs required for the efficacy of dialysis.

|back to top|


H. Preventive Screening Tests, Immunizations, and Vaccines

Another new exception is available for preventive screening tests, immunizations, and vaccines that are covered by Medicare, identified by CPT and HCPCS codes, subject to HCFA-mandated frequency limits, and paid by Medicare on a fee schedule. In addition, the arrangement for the provision of these tests, immunizations, and vaccines must not violate the anti-kickback statute, and billing and claims for these items must be in accordance with applicable law and regulations. HCFA's stated reason for issuing this exception is to implement Congress' intent to provide preventive care for Medicare beneficiaries, and because it believes there is a low risk of fraud or abuse associated with the provision of items that are subject to frequency limits.

|back to top|


I. Eyeglasses and Contact Lenses

The final rule permits physicians to furnish eyeglasses or contact lenses to patients following cataract surgery in accordance with the Medicare coverage and payment provisions for the furnishing of such items. As with most of the other exceptions in this category, the eyeglasses or contacts must be furnished under an arrangement that does not violate the anti-kickback statute. Billing and claims submission for these items must comply with applicable laws and regulations. In providing for this exception, HCFA reasons that there is little risk of under or over-utilization because Medicare covers only one pair of eyeglasses or contacts after cataract surgery, and Medicare pays fixed amounts for these items regardless of their actual cost.

|back to top|

To next page

 

 

Site Map  •   Contact Us  •   Privacy Policy  •   Disclaimer
330 North Wabash Ave., Suite 2500, Chicago, IL 60611-7617 Copyright ©2009 AAPM&R All Rights Reserved