-
The problem is more complex than the investigator
realizes – i.e., work can’t be accomplished in the proposed project
period. (Note: This often happens when a topic has not been narrowed
sufficiently.)
-
The problem is of insignificant importance or is
unlikely to produce any new or useful information.
-
The proposed research is based on an hypothesis that
rests on insufficient evidence or is unsound.
-
The problem is scientifically premature and
warrants, at most, only a pilot study.
-
The description of the nature of the research is
vague and without clear research aims.
-
The proposed tests, or methods, or scientific
procedures are not suited to the stated objective(s).
-
The statistical aspects of the approach have not
been given sufficient consideration.
-
The approach lacks scientific imagination.
-
Controls are either inadequately conceived or
inadequately described.
-
The number of observations is insufficient.
-
Investigator qualifications are not adequate for the
research proposed.
-
The investigator is unfamiliar with recent pertinent
literature or methods or both – i.e. literature citations are outdated.
-
The investigator needs more liaison with colleagues
in this field or in similar fields.
-
The requirements for equipment and/or personnel are
unrealistic or inadequately justified.
-
Funding agency guidelines have not been followed -
i.e. type size, page limitations, missing information.
